[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+G9fYuLvTmVbyEpU3vrw58QaWfN=Eg8VdrdRei_jmu2Y2OzOg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 01:09:40 +0530
From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, regressions@...ts.linux.dev,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>
Subject: Re: [next] arm64: kernel BUG at fs/inode.c:622 - Internal error: Oops
- BUG: 0 - pc : clear_inode
On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 at 00:40, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 12:00 PM Naresh Kamboju
> <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > Following kernel BUG found while booting arm64 Qcom dragonboard 410c with
> > Linux next-20220816 kernel Image.
>
> What kind of environment is this?
>
> Havign that inode list corruption makes it smell a *bit* like the
> crazy memory corruption that we saw with the google cloud instances,
> but that would only happen wif you actually use VIRTIO for your
> environment?
This is a physical hardware db410c device.
Following VIRTIO configs enabled.
CONFIG_BLK_MQ_VIRTIO=y
CONFIG_NET_9P_VIRTIO=y
CONFIG_VIRTIO_BLK=y
CONFIG_SCSI_VIRTIO=y
CONFIG_VIRTIO_NET=y
CONFIG_VIRTIO_CONSOLE=y
CONFIG_VIRTIO_ANCHOR=y
CONFIG_VIRTIO=y
CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI_LIB=y
CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI_LIB_LEGACY=y
CONFIG_VIRTIO_MENU=y
CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI=y
CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI_LEGACY=y
CONFIG_VIRTIO_BALLOON=y
CONFIG_VIRTIO_MMIO=y
CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_VIRTIO=y
>
> Do you see the same issue with plain v6.0-rc1?
Nope. I do not notice reported BUG on v6.0-rc1.
- Naresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists