lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220815180457.638063331@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 15 Aug 2022 19:56:47 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
        "Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@....com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, Jonathan Gray <jsg@....id.au>,
        Mateusz Jończyk <mat.jonczyk@...pl>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.19 0451/1157] drm/radeon: avoid bogus "vram limit (0) must be a power of 2" warning

From: Mateusz Jończyk <mat.jonczyk@...pl>

[ Upstream commit 9da2902609f7519c48eda84f953f72fee53f2b71 ]

I was getting the following message on boot on Linux 5.19-rc5:
        radeon 0000:01:05.0: vram limit (0) must be a power of 2
(I didn't use any radeon.vramlimit commandline parameter).

This is caused by
commit 8c2d34eb53b9 ("drm/radeon: use kernel is_power_of_2 rather than local version")
which removed radeon_check_pot_argument() and converted its users to
is_power_of_2(). The two functions differ in its handling of 0, which is
the default value of radeon_vram_limit: radeon_check_pot_argument()
"incorrectly" considered it a power of 2, while is_power_of_2() does not.

An appropriate conditional silences the warning message.

It is not necessary to add a similar test to other callers of
is_power_of_2() in radeon_device.c. The matching commit in amdgpu:
commit 761175078466 ("drm/amdgpu: use kernel is_power_of_2 rather than local version")
is unaffected by this bug.

Tested on Radeon HD 3200.

Not ccing stable, this is not serious enough.

Fixes: 8c2d34eb53b9 ("drm/radeon: use kernel is_power_of_2 rather than local version")
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Cc: "Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@....com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Cc: Jonathan Gray <jsg@....id.au>
Signed-off-by: Mateusz Jończyk <mat.jonczyk@...pl>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c
index 15692cb241fc..429644d5ddc6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c
@@ -1113,7 +1113,7 @@ static int radeon_gart_size_auto(enum radeon_family family)
 static void radeon_check_arguments(struct radeon_device *rdev)
 {
 	/* vramlimit must be a power of two */
-	if (!is_power_of_2(radeon_vram_limit)) {
+	if (radeon_vram_limit != 0 && !is_power_of_2(radeon_vram_limit)) {
 		dev_warn(rdev->dev, "vram limit (%d) must be a power of 2\n",
 				radeon_vram_limit);
 		radeon_vram_limit = 0;
-- 
2.35.1



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ