lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220815180459.411957333@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 15 Aug 2022 19:57:30 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Anquan Wu <leiqi96@...mail.com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.19 0494/1157] libbpf: Fix the name of a reused map

From: Anquan Wu <leiqi96@...mail.com>

[ Upstream commit bf3f00378524adae16628cbadbd11ba7211863bb ]

BPF map name is limited to BPF_OBJ_NAME_LEN.
A map name is defined as being longer than BPF_OBJ_NAME_LEN,
it will be truncated to BPF_OBJ_NAME_LEN when a userspace program
calls libbpf to create the map. A pinned map also generates a path
in the /sys. If the previous program wanted to reuse the map,
it can not get bpf_map by name, because the name of the map is only
partially the same as the name which get from pinned path.

The syscall information below show that map name "process_pinned_map"
is truncated to "process_pinned_".

    bpf(BPF_OBJ_GET, {pathname="/sys/fs/bpf/process_pinned_map",
    bpf_fd=0, file_flags=0}, 144) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)

    bpf(BPF_MAP_CREATE, {map_type=BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH, key_size=4,
    value_size=4,max_entries=1024, map_flags=0, inner_map_fd=0,
    map_name="process_pinned_",map_ifindex=0, btf_fd=3, btf_key_type_id=6,
    btf_value_type_id=10,btf_vmlinux_value_type_id=0}, 72) = 4

This patch check that if the name of pinned map are the same as the
actual name for the first (BPF_OBJ_NAME_LEN - 1),
bpf map still uses the name which is included in bpf object.

Fixes: 26736eb9a483 ("tools: libbpf: allow map reuse")
Signed-off-by: Anquan Wu <leiqi96@...mail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/OSZP286MB1725CEA1C95C5CB8E7CCC53FB8869@OSZP286MB1725.JPNP286.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 9 +++++++--
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index b9245bf688fa..5b9b42ab7aa0 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -4327,7 +4327,7 @@ int bpf_map__set_autocreate(struct bpf_map *map, bool autocreate)
 int bpf_map__reuse_fd(struct bpf_map *map, int fd)
 {
 	struct bpf_map_info info = {};
-	__u32 len = sizeof(info);
+	__u32 len = sizeof(info), name_len;
 	int new_fd, err;
 	char *new_name;
 
@@ -4337,7 +4337,12 @@ int bpf_map__reuse_fd(struct bpf_map *map, int fd)
 	if (err)
 		return libbpf_err(err);
 
-	new_name = strdup(info.name);
+	name_len = strlen(info.name);
+	if (name_len == BPF_OBJ_NAME_LEN - 1 && strncmp(map->name, info.name, name_len) == 0)
+		new_name = strdup(map->name);
+	else
+		new_name = strdup(info.name);
+
 	if (!new_name)
 		return libbpf_err(-errno);
 
-- 
2.35.1



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ