[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YvqyM3n48Q/0i9XZ@chromium.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 14:53:07 -0600
From: Jack Rosenthal <jrosenth@...omium.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Cc: chrome-platform@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...nel.org>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8] firmware: google: Implement cbmem in sysfs driver
Thanks for the detailed review!
On 2022-08-09 at 20:49 -0500, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> /sys/firmware/coreboot/cbmem?
Fixed in v9.
> > +#include <linux/ctype.h>
>
> What is used from this header?
Not used, fixed in v9.
> Are all entries supposed to be writeable? Are there entries that are
> read-only?
The idea here was that we could use crossystem to update the cbmem entry
when it makes changes, however, I do see this as an odd usage of the
ABI, and in v9, I removed writing entirely and all entries are now
read-only.
If tools like crossystem need to maintain changes to this buffer, they
should either maintain that copy themselves in /run or something, or
daemonize and keep it in their process' memory.
> > + return cbmem_entry_setup(entry);
>
> Is there a reason this isn't inlined here?
cbmem_entry_setup was already a little long, so I just did this for
reading clarity. If you think it would be clearer just inlined here, I
can change it (let me know).
> Need to set .owner = THIS_MODULE unless you use
> module_coreboot_driver().
Done.
> > + if (!coreboot_kobj)
>
> cbmem_kobj?
Done.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists