[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SA1PR21MB1335D2774A05B3C95233921BBF689@SA1PR21MB1335.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 21:10:12 +0000
From: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
CC: "quic_jhugo@...cinc.com" <quic_jhugo@...cinc.com>,
"wei.liu@...nel.org" <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
"lpieralisi@...nel.org" <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Michael Kelley (LINUX)" <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
"robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>, "kw@...ux.com" <kw@...ux.com>,
"alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"boqun.feng@...il.com" <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <Boqun.Feng@...rosoft.com>,
Carl Vanderlip <quic_carlv@...cinc.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] PCI: hv: Fix the definiton of vector in
hv_compose_msi_msg()
> From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
> Sent: Monday, August 15, 2022 1:36 PM
> To: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
>
> s/definiton/definition/ in subject
> (only if you have other occasion to repost this)
Thanks, Bjorn! I suppose Wei can help fix this. :-)
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 11:55:05AM -0700, Dexuan Cui wrote:
> > The local variable 'vector' must be u32 rather than u8: see the
> > struct hv_msi_desc3.
> >
> > 'vector_count' should be u16 rather than u8: see struct hv_msi_desc,
> > hv_msi_desc2 and hv_msi_desc3.
> >
> > Fixes: a2bad844a67b ("PCI: hv: Fix interrupt mapping for multi-MSI")
> > Signed-off-by: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
> > Cc: Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@...cinc.com>
> > Cc: Carl Vanderlip <quic_carlv@...cinc.com>
>
> Looks like Wei has been applying most changes to pci-hyperv.c, so I
> assume the same will happen here.
So I interpret this as an ack for Wei to apply the earlier patch
[PATCH] PCI: hv: Only reuse existing IRTE allocation for Multi-MSI
and this patch.
The two small patches are pure Hyper-V specific changes, so IMO it's
better for them to go through Wei's Hyper-V tree rather than the PCI tree.
(It looks like the PCI folks are too busy right now)
> > ---
> >
> > The patch should be appplied after the earlier patch:
> > [PATCH] PCI: hv: Only reuse existing IRTE allocation for Multi-MSI
Powered by blists - more mailing lists