linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.19 0780/1157] dmaengine: sf-pdma: Add multithread support for a DMA channel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220815180510.706154414@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 15 Aug 2022 20:02:16 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Viacheslav Mitrofanov <v.v.mitrofanov@...ro.com>,
        Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.19 0780/1157] dmaengine: sf-pdma: Add multithread support for a DMA channel

From: Viacheslav Mitrofanov <v.v.mitrofanov@...ro.com>

[ Upstream commit b2cc5c465c2cb8ab697c3fd6583c614e3f6cfbcc ]

When we get a DMA channel and try to use it in multiple threads it
will cause oops and hanging the system.

% echo 64 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/threads_per_chan
% echo 10000 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/iterations
% echo 1 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/run
[   89.480664] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual
               address 00000000000000a0
[   89.488725] Oops [#1]
[   89.494708] CPU: 2 PID: 1008 Comm: dma0chan0-copy0 Not tainted
               5.17.0-rc5
[   89.509385] epc : vchan_find_desc+0x32/0x46
[   89.513553]  ra : sf_pdma_tx_status+0xca/0xd6

This happens because of data race. Each thread rewrite channels's
descriptor as soon as device_prep_dma_memcpy() is called. It leads to the
situation when the driver thinks that it uses right descriptor that
actually is freed or substituted for other one.

With current fixes a descriptor changes its value only when it has
been used. A new descriptor is acquired from vc->desc_issued queue that
is already filled with descriptors that are ready to be sent. Threads
have no direct access to DMA channel descriptor. Now it is just possible
to queue a descriptor for further processing.

Fixes: 6973886ad58e ("dmaengine: sf-pdma: add platform DMA support for HiFive Unleashed A00")
Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Mitrofanov <v.v.mitrofanov@...ro.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220701082942.12835-1-v.v.mitrofanov@yadro.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/dma/sf-pdma/sf-pdma.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma/sf-pdma/sf-pdma.c b/drivers/dma/sf-pdma/sf-pdma.c
index db5a4ef76077..4f8b8498c5c6 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/sf-pdma/sf-pdma.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/sf-pdma/sf-pdma.c
@@ -52,16 +52,6 @@ static inline struct sf_pdma_desc *to_sf_pdma_desc(struct virt_dma_desc *vd)
 static struct sf_pdma_desc *sf_pdma_alloc_desc(struct sf_pdma_chan *chan)
 {
 	struct sf_pdma_desc *desc;
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&chan->lock, flags);
-
-	if (chan->desc && !chan->desc->in_use) {
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chan->lock, flags);
-		return chan->desc;
-	}
-
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chan->lock, flags);
 
 	desc = kzalloc(sizeof(*desc), GFP_NOWAIT);
 	if (!desc)
@@ -111,7 +101,6 @@ sf_pdma_prep_dma_memcpy(struct dma_chan *dchan,	dma_addr_t dest, dma_addr_t src,
 	desc->async_tx = vchan_tx_prep(&chan->vchan, &desc->vdesc, flags);
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&chan->vchan.lock, iflags);
-	chan->desc = desc;
 	sf_pdma_fill_desc(desc, dest, src, len);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chan->vchan.lock, iflags);
 
@@ -170,11 +159,17 @@ static size_t sf_pdma_desc_residue(struct sf_pdma_chan *chan,
 	unsigned long flags;
 	u64 residue = 0;
 	struct sf_pdma_desc *desc;
-	struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *tx;
+	struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *tx = NULL;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&chan->vchan.lock, flags);
 
-	tx = &chan->desc->vdesc.tx;
+	list_for_each_entry(vd, &chan->vchan.desc_submitted, node)
+		if (vd->tx.cookie == cookie)
+			tx = &vd->tx;
+
+	if (!tx)
+		goto out;
+
 	if (cookie == tx->chan->completed_cookie)
 		goto out;
 
@@ -241,6 +236,19 @@ static void sf_pdma_enable_request(struct sf_pdma_chan *chan)
 	writel(v, regs->ctrl);
 }
 
+static struct sf_pdma_desc *sf_pdma_get_first_pending_desc(struct sf_pdma_chan *chan)
+{
+	struct virt_dma_chan *vchan = &chan->vchan;
+	struct virt_dma_desc *vdesc;
+
+	if (list_empty(&vchan->desc_issued))
+		return NULL;
+
+	vdesc = list_first_entry(&vchan->desc_issued, struct virt_dma_desc, node);
+
+	return container_of(vdesc, struct sf_pdma_desc, vdesc);
+}
+
 static void sf_pdma_xfer_desc(struct sf_pdma_chan *chan)
 {
 	struct sf_pdma_desc *desc = chan->desc;
@@ -268,8 +276,11 @@ static void sf_pdma_issue_pending(struct dma_chan *dchan)
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&chan->vchan.lock, flags);
 
-	if (vchan_issue_pending(&chan->vchan) && chan->desc)
+	if (!chan->desc && vchan_issue_pending(&chan->vchan)) {
+		/* vchan_issue_pending has made a check that desc in not NULL */
+		chan->desc = sf_pdma_get_first_pending_desc(chan);
 		sf_pdma_xfer_desc(chan);
+	}
 
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chan->vchan.lock, flags);
 }
@@ -298,6 +309,11 @@ static void sf_pdma_donebh_tasklet(struct tasklet_struct *t)
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&chan->vchan.lock, flags);
 	list_del(&chan->desc->vdesc.node);
 	vchan_cookie_complete(&chan->desc->vdesc);
+
+	chan->desc = sf_pdma_get_first_pending_desc(chan);
+	if (chan->desc)
+		sf_pdma_xfer_desc(chan);
+
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chan->vchan.lock, flags);
 }
 
-- 
2.35.1