linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.19 1106/1157] Revert "KVM: x86/pmu: Accept 0 for absent PMU MSRs when host-initiated if !enable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220815180524.516213846@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 15 Aug 2022 20:07:42 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.19 1106/1157] Revert "KVM: x86/pmu: Accept 0 for absent PMU MSRs when host-initiated if !enable_pmu"

From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>

[ Upstream commit 5d4283df5a0fc8299fba9443c33d219939eccc2d ]

Eating reads and writes to all "PMU" MSRs when there is no PMU is wildly
broken as it results in allowing accesses to _any_ MSR on Intel CPUs
as intel_is_valid_msr() returns true for all host_initiated accesses.

A revert of commit d1c88a402056 ("KVM: x86: always allow host-initiated
writes to PMU MSRs") will soon follow.

This reverts commit 8e6a58e28b34e8d247e772159b8fa8f6bae39192.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Message-Id: <20220611005755.753273-4-seanjc@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c     |  8 --------
 arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c | 11 +----------
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
index 2334ddfbbab2..3f868fed9114 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
@@ -433,19 +433,11 @@ static void kvm_pmu_mark_pmc_in_use(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr)
 
 int kvm_pmu_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
 {
-	if (msr_info->host_initiated && !vcpu->kvm->arch.enable_pmu) {
-		msr_info->data = 0;
-		return 0;
-	}
-
 	return static_call(kvm_x86_pmu_get_msr)(vcpu, msr_info);
 }
 
 int kvm_pmu_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
 {
-	if (msr_info->host_initiated && !vcpu->kvm->arch.enable_pmu)
-		return !!msr_info->data;
-
 	kvm_pmu_mark_pmc_in_use(vcpu, msr_info->index);
 	return static_call(kvm_x86_pmu_set_msr)(vcpu, msr_info);
 }
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c
index d93ecb25fe17..136039fc6d01 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c
@@ -232,16 +232,7 @@ static struct kvm_pmc *amd_rdpmc_ecx_to_pmc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 static bool amd_is_valid_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr)
 {
 	/* All MSRs refer to exactly one PMC, so msr_idx_to_pmc is enough.  */
-	if (!host_initiated)
-		return false;
-
-	switch (msr) {
-	case MSR_K7_EVNTSEL0 ... MSR_K7_PERFCTR3:
-	case MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL0 ... MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR5:
-		return true;
-	default:
-		return false;
-	}
+	return false;
 }
 
 static struct kvm_pmc *amd_msr_idx_to_pmc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr)
-- 
2.35.1