linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] Revert "mlxsw: core: Add the hottest thermal zone detection"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yv0TIH0LsjFJwV0L@shredder>
Date:   Wed, 17 Aug 2022 19:11:12 +0300
From:   Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
To:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, kuba@...nel.org
Cc:     rafael@...nel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, vadimp@...lanox.com,
        davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vadimp@...dia.com, petrm@...dia.com,
        edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] Revert "mlxsw: core: Add the hottest thermal zone
 detection"

On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 05:30:40PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> This reverts commit 2dc2f760052da4925482ecdcdc5c94d4a599153c and
> commit 6f73862fabd93213de157d9cc6ef76084311c628.
> 
> As discussed in the thread:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/f3c62ebe-7d59-c537-a010-bff366c8aeba@linaro.org/
> 
> the feature provided by commits 2dc2f760052da and 6f73862fabd93 is
> actually already handled by the thermal framework via the cooling
> device state aggregation, thus all this code is pointless.
> 
> The revert conflicts with the following changes:
>  - 7f4957be0d5b8: thermal: Use mode helpers in drivers
>  - 6a79507cfe94c: mlxsw: core: Extend thermal module with per QSFP module thermal zones
> 
> These conflicts were fixed and the resulting changes are in this patch.
> 
> Both reverts are in the same change as requested by Ido Schimmel:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/Yvz7+RUsmVco3Xpj@shredder/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
> Tested-by: Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@...dia.com>

Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>

Jakub, Daniel wants to route this patch via his tree. Do you mind?
I spoke with Vadim earlier this week and we do not expect changes to
this file during the current cycle.

Thanks