lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YvtqPQhs0uQHuwID@bullseye>
Date:   Tue, 16 Aug 2022 09:58:21 +0000
From:   Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@...il.com>
To:     Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@...rdevices.ru>
Cc:     Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@...il.com>,
        "virtio-dev@...ts.oasis-open.org" <virtio-dev@...ts.oasis-open.org>,
        Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@...edance.com>,
        Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>,
        Jiang Wang <jiang.wang@...edance.com>,
        Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
        Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org" 
        <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH 5/6] virtio/vsock: add support for dgram

On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 05:42:08AM +0000, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
> On 17.08.2022 08:01, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
> > On 16.08.2022 05:32, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> >> CC'ing virtio-dev@...ts.oasis-open.org
> >>
> >> On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 10:56:08AM -0700, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> >>> This patch supports dgram in virtio and on the vhost side.
> > Hello,
> > 
> > sorry, i don't understand, how this maintains message boundaries? Or it
> > is unnecessary for SOCK_DGRAM?
> > 
> > Thanks
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Jiang Wang <jiang.wang@...edance.com>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@...edance.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>  drivers/vhost/vsock.c                   |   2 +-
> >>>  include/net/af_vsock.h                  |   2 +
> >>>  include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h       |   1 +
> >>>  net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c                |  26 +++-
> >>>  net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c        |   2 +-
> >>>  net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 173 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >>>  6 files changed, 186 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> >>> index a5d1bdb786fe..3dc72a5647ca 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> >>> @@ -925,7 +925,7 @@ static int __init vhost_vsock_init(void)
> >>>  	int ret;
> >>>  
> >>>  	ret = vsock_core_register(&vhost_transport.transport,
> >>> -				  VSOCK_TRANSPORT_F_H2G);
> >>> +				  VSOCK_TRANSPORT_F_H2G | VSOCK_TRANSPORT_F_DGRAM);
> >>>  	if (ret < 0)
> >>>  		return ret;
> >>>  
> >>> diff --git a/include/net/af_vsock.h b/include/net/af_vsock.h
> >>> index 1c53c4c4d88f..37e55c81e4df 100644
> >>> --- a/include/net/af_vsock.h
> >>> +++ b/include/net/af_vsock.h
> >>> @@ -78,6 +78,8 @@ struct vsock_sock {
> >>>  s64 vsock_stream_has_data(struct vsock_sock *vsk);
> >>>  s64 vsock_stream_has_space(struct vsock_sock *vsk);
> >>>  struct sock *vsock_create_connected(struct sock *parent);
> >>> +int vsock_bind_stream(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> >>> +		      struct sockaddr_vm *addr);
> >>>  
> >>>  /**** TRANSPORT ****/
> >>>  
> >>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h
> >>> index 857df3a3a70d..0975b9c88292 100644
> >>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h
> >>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h
> >>> @@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ struct virtio_vsock_hdr {
> >>>  enum virtio_vsock_type {
> >>>  	VIRTIO_VSOCK_TYPE_STREAM = 1,
> >>>  	VIRTIO_VSOCK_TYPE_SEQPACKET = 2,
> >>> +	VIRTIO_VSOCK_TYPE_DGRAM = 3,
> >>>  };
> >>>  
> >>>  enum virtio_vsock_op {
> >>> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> >>> index 1893f8aafa48..87e4ae1866d3 100644
> >>> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> >>> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> >>> @@ -675,6 +675,19 @@ static int __vsock_bind_connectible(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> >>>  	return 0;
> >>>  }
> >>>  
> >>> +int vsock_bind_stream(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> >>> +		      struct sockaddr_vm *addr)
> >>> +{
> >>> +	int retval;
> >>> +
> >>> +	spin_lock_bh(&vsock_table_lock);
> >>> +	retval = __vsock_bind_connectible(vsk, addr);
> >>> +	spin_unlock_bh(&vsock_table_lock);
> >>> +
> >>> +	return retval;
> >>> +}
> >>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(vsock_bind_stream);
> >>> +
> >>>  static int __vsock_bind_dgram(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> >>>  			      struct sockaddr_vm *addr)
> >>>  {
> >>> @@ -2363,11 +2376,16 @@ int vsock_core_register(const struct vsock_transport *t, int features)
> >>>  	}
> >>>  
> >>>  	if (features & VSOCK_TRANSPORT_F_DGRAM) {
> >>> -		if (t_dgram) {
> >>> -			err = -EBUSY;
> >>> -			goto err_busy;
> >>> +		/* TODO: always chose the G2H variant over others, support nesting later */
> >>> +		if (features & VSOCK_TRANSPORT_F_G2H) {
> >>> +			if (t_dgram)
> >>> +				pr_warn("virtio_vsock: t_dgram already set\n");
> >>> +			t_dgram = t;
> >>> +		}
> >>> +
> >>> +		if (!t_dgram) {
> >>> +			t_dgram = t;
> >>>  		}
> >>> -		t_dgram = t;
> >>>  	}
> >>>  
> >>>  	if (features & VSOCK_TRANSPORT_F_LOCAL) {
> >>> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
> >>> index 073314312683..d4526ca462d2 100644
> >>> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
> >>> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
> >>> @@ -850,7 +850,7 @@ static int __init virtio_vsock_init(void)
> >>>  		return -ENOMEM;
> >>>  
> >>>  	ret = vsock_core_register(&virtio_transport.transport,
> >>> -				  VSOCK_TRANSPORT_F_G2H);
> >>> +				  VSOCK_TRANSPORT_F_G2H | VSOCK_TRANSPORT_F_DGRAM);
> >>>  	if (ret)
> >>>  		goto out_wq;
> >>>  
> >>> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> >>> index bdf16fff054f..aedb48728677 100644
> >>> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> >>> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> >>> @@ -229,7 +229,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtio_transport_deliver_tap_pkt);
> >>>  
> >>>  static u16 virtio_transport_get_type(struct sock *sk)
> >>>  {
> >>> -	if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_STREAM)
> >>> +	if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_DGRAM)
> >>> +		return VIRTIO_VSOCK_TYPE_DGRAM;
> >>> +	else if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_STREAM)
> >>>  		return VIRTIO_VSOCK_TYPE_STREAM;
> >>>  	else
> >>>  		return VIRTIO_VSOCK_TYPE_SEQPACKET;
> >>> @@ -287,22 +289,29 @@ static int virtio_transport_send_pkt_info(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> >>>  	vvs = vsk->trans;
> >>>  
> >>>  	/* we can send less than pkt_len bytes */
> >>> -	if (pkt_len > VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_PKT_BUF_SIZE)
> >>> -		pkt_len = VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_PKT_BUF_SIZE;
> >>> +	if (pkt_len > VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_PKT_BUF_SIZE) {
> >>> +		if (info->type != VIRTIO_VSOCK_TYPE_DGRAM)
> >>> +			pkt_len = VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_PKT_BUF_SIZE;
> >>> +		else
> >>> +			return 0;
> >>> +	}
> >>>  
> >>> -	/* virtio_transport_get_credit might return less than pkt_len credit */
> >>> -	pkt_len = virtio_transport_get_credit(vvs, pkt_len);
> >>> +	if (info->type != VIRTIO_VSOCK_TYPE_DGRAM) {
> >>> +		/* virtio_transport_get_credit might return less than pkt_len credit */
> >>> +		pkt_len = virtio_transport_get_credit(vvs, pkt_len);
> >>>  
> >>> -	/* Do not send zero length OP_RW pkt */
> >>> -	if (pkt_len == 0 && info->op == VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RW)
> >>> -		return pkt_len;
> >>> +		/* Do not send zero length OP_RW pkt */
> >>> +		if (pkt_len == 0 && info->op == VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RW)
> >>> +			return pkt_len;
> >>> +	}
> >>>  
> >>>  	skb = virtio_transport_alloc_skb(info, pkt_len,
> >>>  					 src_cid, src_port,
> >>>  					 dst_cid, dst_port,
> >>>  					 &err);
> >>>  	if (!skb) {
> >>> -		virtio_transport_put_credit(vvs, pkt_len);
> >>> +		if (info->type != VIRTIO_VSOCK_TYPE_DGRAM)
> >>> +			virtio_transport_put_credit(vvs, pkt_len);
> >>>  		return err;
> >>>  	}
> >>>  
> >>> @@ -586,6 +595,61 @@ virtio_transport_seqpacket_dequeue(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> >>>  }
> >>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtio_transport_seqpacket_dequeue);
> >>>  
> >>> +static ssize_t
> >>> +virtio_transport_dgram_do_dequeue(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> >>> +				  struct msghdr *msg, size_t len)
> >>> +{
> >>> +	struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs = vsk->trans;
> >>> +	struct sk_buff *skb;
> >>> +	size_t total = 0;
> >>> +	u32 free_space;
> >>> +	int err = -EFAULT;
> >>> +
> >>> +	spin_lock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
> >>> +	if (total < len && !skb_queue_empty_lockless(&vvs->rx_queue)) {
> >>> +		skb = __skb_dequeue(&vvs->rx_queue);
> >>> +
> >>> +		total = len;
> >>> +		if (total > skb->len - vsock_metadata(skb)->off)
> >>> +			total = skb->len - vsock_metadata(skb)->off;
> >>> +		else if (total < skb->len - vsock_metadata(skb)->off)
> >>> +			msg->msg_flags |= MSG_TRUNC;
> >>> +
> >>> +		/* sk_lock is held by caller so no one else can dequeue.
> >>> +		 * Unlock rx_lock since memcpy_to_msg() may sleep.
> >>> +		 */
> >>> +		spin_unlock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
> >>> +
> >>> +		err = memcpy_to_msg(msg, skb->data + vsock_metadata(skb)->off, total);
> >>> +		if (err)
> >>> +			return err;
> >>> +
> >>> +		spin_lock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
> >>> +
> >>> +		virtio_transport_dec_rx_pkt(vvs, skb);
> >>> +		consume_skb(skb);
> >>> +	}
> >>> +
> >>> +	free_space = vvs->buf_alloc - (vvs->fwd_cnt - vvs->last_fwd_cnt);
> >>> +
> >>> +	spin_unlock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
> >>> +
> >>> +	if (total > 0 && msg->msg_name) {
> >>> +		/* Provide the address of the sender. */
> >>> +		DECLARE_SOCKADDR(struct sockaddr_vm *, vm_addr, msg->msg_name);
> >>> +
> >>> +		vsock_addr_init(vm_addr, le64_to_cpu(vsock_hdr(skb)->src_cid),
> >>> +				le32_to_cpu(vsock_hdr(skb)->src_port));
> >>> +		msg->msg_namelen = sizeof(*vm_addr);
> >>> +	}
> >>> +	return total;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static s64 virtio_transport_dgram_has_data(struct vsock_sock *vsk)
> >>> +{
> >>> +	return virtio_transport_stream_has_data(vsk);
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>>  int
> >>>  virtio_transport_seqpacket_enqueue(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> >>>  				   struct msghdr *msg,
> >>> @@ -611,7 +675,66 @@ virtio_transport_dgram_dequeue(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> >>>  			       struct msghdr *msg,
> >>>  			       size_t len, int flags)
> >>>  {
> >>> -	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >>> +	struct sock *sk;
> >>> +	size_t err = 0;
> >>> +	long timeout;
> >>> +
> >>> +	DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
> >>> +
> >>> +	sk = &vsk->sk;
> >>> +	err = 0;
> >>> +
> >>> +	if (flags & MSG_OOB || flags & MSG_ERRQUEUE || flags & MSG_PEEK)
> >>> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >>> +
> >>> +	lock_sock(sk);
> >>> +
> >>> +	if (!len)
> >>> +		goto out;
> >>> +
> >>> +	timeout = sock_rcvtimeo(sk, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT);
> >>> +
> >>> +	while (1) {
> >>> +		s64 ready;
> >>> +
> >>> +		prepare_to_wait(sk_sleep(sk), &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> >>> +		ready = virtio_transport_dgram_has_data(vsk);
> >>> +
> >>> +		if (ready == 0) {
> >>> +			if (timeout == 0) {
> >>> +				err = -EAGAIN;
> >>> +				finish_wait(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
> >>> +				break;
> >>> +			}
> >>> +
> >>> +			release_sock(sk);
> >>> +			timeout = schedule_timeout(timeout);
> >>> +			lock_sock(sk);
> >>> +
> >>> +			if (signal_pending(current)) {
> >>> +				err = sock_intr_errno(timeout);
> >>> +				finish_wait(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
> >>> +				break;
> >>> +			} else if (timeout == 0) {
> >>> +				err = -EAGAIN;
> >>> +				finish_wait(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
> >>> +				break;
> >>> +			}
> >>> +		} else {
> >>> +			finish_wait(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
> >>> +
> >>> +			if (ready < 0) {
> >>> +				err = -ENOMEM;
> >>> +				goto out;
> >>> +			}
> >>> +
> >>> +			err = virtio_transport_dgram_do_dequeue(vsk, msg, len);
> >>> +			break;
> >>> +		}
> >>> +	}
> >>> +out:
> >>> +	release_sock(sk);
> >>> +	return err;
> >>>  }
> >>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtio_transport_dgram_dequeue);
> ^^^
> May be, this generic data waiting logic should be in af_vsock.c, as for stream/seqpacket?
> In this way, another transport which supports SOCK_DGRAM could reuse it.

I think that is a great idea. I'll test that change for v2.

Thanks.

> >>>  
> >>> @@ -819,13 +942,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtio_transport_stream_allow);
> >>>  int virtio_transport_dgram_bind(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> >>>  				struct sockaddr_vm *addr)
> >>>  {
> >>> -	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >>> +	return vsock_bind_stream(vsk, addr);
> >>>  }
> >>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtio_transport_dgram_bind);
> >>>  
> >>>  bool virtio_transport_dgram_allow(u32 cid, u32 port)
> >>>  {
> >>> -	return false;
> >>> +	return true;
> >>>  }
> >>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtio_transport_dgram_allow);
> >>>  
> >>> @@ -861,7 +984,16 @@ virtio_transport_dgram_enqueue(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> >>>  			       struct msghdr *msg,
> >>>  			       size_t dgram_len)
> >>>  {
> >>> -	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >>> +	struct virtio_vsock_pkt_info info = {
> >>> +		.op = VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RW,
> >>> +		.msg = msg,
> >>> +		.pkt_len = dgram_len,
> >>> +		.vsk = vsk,
> >>> +		.remote_cid = remote_addr->svm_cid,
> >>> +		.remote_port = remote_addr->svm_port,
> >>> +	};
> >>> +
> >>> +	return virtio_transport_send_pkt_info(vsk, &info);
> >>>  }
> >>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtio_transport_dgram_enqueue);
> >>>  
> >>> @@ -1165,6 +1297,12 @@ virtio_transport_recv_connected(struct sock *sk,
> >>>  	struct virtio_vsock_hdr *hdr = vsock_hdr(skb);
> >>>  	int err = 0;
> >>>  
> >>> +	if (le16_to_cpu(vsock_hdr(skb)->type) == VIRTIO_VSOCK_TYPE_DGRAM) {
> >>> +		virtio_transport_recv_enqueue(vsk, skb);
> >>> +		sk->sk_data_ready(sk);
> >>> +		return err;
> >>> +	}
> >>> +
> >>>  	switch (le16_to_cpu(hdr->op)) {
> >>>  	case VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RW:
> >>>  		virtio_transport_recv_enqueue(vsk, skb);
> >>> @@ -1320,7 +1458,8 @@ virtio_transport_recv_listen(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
> >>>  static bool virtio_transport_valid_type(u16 type)
> >>>  {
> >>>  	return (type == VIRTIO_VSOCK_TYPE_STREAM) ||
> >>> -	       (type == VIRTIO_VSOCK_TYPE_SEQPACKET);
> >>> +	       (type == VIRTIO_VSOCK_TYPE_SEQPACKET) ||
> >>> +	       (type == VIRTIO_VSOCK_TYPE_DGRAM);
> >>>  }
> >>>  
> >>>  /* We are under the virtio-vsock's vsock->rx_lock or vhost-vsock's vq->mutex
> >>> @@ -1384,6 +1523,11 @@ void virtio_transport_recv_pkt(struct virtio_transport *t,
> >>>  		goto free_pkt;
> >>>  	}
> >>>  
> >>> +	if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_DGRAM) {
> >>> +		virtio_transport_recv_connected(sk, skb);
> >>> +		goto out;
> >>> +	}
> >>> +
> >>>  	space_available = virtio_transport_space_update(sk, skb);
> >>>  
> >>>  	/* Update CID in case it has changed after a transport reset event */
> >>> @@ -1415,6 +1559,7 @@ void virtio_transport_recv_pkt(struct virtio_transport *t,
> >>>  		break;
> >>>  	}
> >>>  
> >>> +out:
> >>>  	release_sock(sk);
> >>>  
> >>>  	/* Release refcnt obtained when we fetched this socket out of the
> >>> -- 
> >>> 2.35.1
> >>>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@...ts.oasis-open.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@...ts.oasis-open.org
> >>
> > 
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ