[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQJsDYhNmP6G7O8tVfHZ7rQLeJ4KpwAQweVidny0fgTbyw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 09:41:14 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@...edance.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Feng Zhou <zhoufeng.zf@...edance.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpf: Simplify code by using for_each_cpu_wrap()
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 6:08 AM Punit Agrawal
<punit.agrawal@...edance.com> wrote:
>
> No functional change intended.
?
> - orig_cpu = cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
> - while (1) {
> + for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, cpu_possible_mask, raw_smp_processor_id()) {
> struct pcpu_freelist_head *head;
>
> head = per_cpu_ptr(s->freelist, cpu);
> @@ -68,15 +67,10 @@ static inline void ___pcpu_freelist_push_nmi(struct pcpu_freelist *s,
> raw_spin_unlock(&head->lock);
> return;
> }
> - cpu = cpumask_next(cpu, cpu_possible_mask);
> - if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
> - cpu = 0;
> -
> - /* cannot lock any per cpu lock, try extralist */
> - if (cpu == orig_cpu &&
> - pcpu_freelist_try_push_extra(s, node))
> - return;
> }
> +
> + /* cannot lock any per cpu lock, try extralist */
> + pcpu_freelist_try_push_extra(s, node);
This is obviously not equivalent!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists