linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][next] selftests/bpf: Fix spelling mistake "succesful" -> "successful"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <818C5CC9-31CA-4DED-90E8-455B03AA9352@fb.com>
Date:   Wed, 17 Aug 2022 18:46:32 +0000
From:   Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>
To:     Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>
CC:     Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
        Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
        Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
        Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        "bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] selftests/bpf: Fix spelling mistake "succesful" ->
 "successful"

Hi Colin,

Thanks for your patch!

Can you change patch title to "[PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Fix spelling mistake "succesful” (kfunc_call.c)”?

Regards,
Mykola

> On Aug 17, 2022, at 1:34 AM, Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> !-------------------------------------------------------------------|
>  This Message Is From an External Sender
> 
> |-------------------------------------------------------------------!
> 
> There is a spelling mistake in an ASSERT_OK literal string. Fix it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c
> index 351fafa006fb..eede7c304f86 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c
> @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ static void test_destructive(void)
> {
> 	__u64 save_caps = 0;
> 
> -	ASSERT_OK(test_destructive_open_and_load(), "succesful_load");
> +	ASSERT_OK(test_destructive_open_and_load(), "successful_load");
> 
> 	if (!ASSERT_OK(cap_disable_effective(1ULL << CAP_SYS_BOOT, &save_caps), "drop_caps"))
> 		return;
> -- 
> 2.37.1
>