[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220817025650.3253959-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 10:56:50 +0800
From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To: iommu@...ts.linux.dev
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>, yi.l.liu@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] iommu/vt-d: Fix possible recursive lock in iommu_flush_dev_iotlb()
The per domain spinlock is acquired in iommu_flush_dev_iotlb(), which
is possbile to be called in the interrupt context. For instance,
<IRQ>
iommu_flush_dev_iotlb
iommu_flush_iotlb_psi
intel_iommu_tlb_sync
iommu_iotlb_sync
__iommu_dma_unmap
? nvme_unmap_data
nvme_unmap_data
nvme_pci_complete_rq
nvme_irq
__handle_irq_event_percpu
handle_irq_event_percpu
handle_irq_event
handle_edge_irq
__common_interrupt
common_interrupt
This coverts the spin_lock/unlock() into the irq save/restore varieties
to avoid the possible recursive locking issues.
Fixes: ffd5869d93530 ("iommu/vt-d: Replace spin_lock_irqsave() with spin_lock()")
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
---
drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
index 2d0d2ef820d2..8d4f6f0b6c1c 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
@@ -495,8 +495,9 @@ static int domain_update_device_node(struct dmar_domain *domain)
{
struct device_domain_info *info;
int nid = NUMA_NO_NODE;
+ unsigned long flags;
- spin_lock(&domain->lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&domain->lock, flags);
list_for_each_entry(info, &domain->devices, link) {
/*
* There could possibly be multiple device numa nodes as devices
@@ -508,7 +509,7 @@ static int domain_update_device_node(struct dmar_domain *domain)
if (nid != NUMA_NO_NODE)
break;
}
- spin_unlock(&domain->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&domain->lock, flags);
return nid;
}
@@ -1336,19 +1337,20 @@ iommu_support_dev_iotlb(struct dmar_domain *domain, struct intel_iommu *iommu,
u8 bus, u8 devfn)
{
struct device_domain_info *info;
+ unsigned long flags;
if (!iommu->qi)
return NULL;
- spin_lock(&domain->lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&domain->lock, flags);
list_for_each_entry(info, &domain->devices, link) {
if (info->iommu == iommu && info->bus == bus &&
info->devfn == devfn) {
- spin_unlock(&domain->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&domain->lock, flags);
return info->ats_supported ? info : NULL;
}
}
- spin_unlock(&domain->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&domain->lock, flags);
return NULL;
}
@@ -1357,8 +1359,9 @@ static void domain_update_iotlb(struct dmar_domain *domain)
{
struct device_domain_info *info;
bool has_iotlb_device = false;
+ unsigned long flags;
- spin_lock(&domain->lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&domain->lock, flags);
list_for_each_entry(info, &domain->devices, link) {
if (info->ats_enabled) {
has_iotlb_device = true;
@@ -1366,7 +1369,7 @@ static void domain_update_iotlb(struct dmar_domain *domain)
}
}
domain->has_iotlb_device = has_iotlb_device;
- spin_unlock(&domain->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&domain->lock, flags);
}
static void iommu_enable_dev_iotlb(struct device_domain_info *info)
@@ -1458,14 +1461,15 @@ static void iommu_flush_dev_iotlb(struct dmar_domain *domain,
u64 addr, unsigned mask)
{
struct device_domain_info *info;
+ unsigned long flags;
if (!domain->has_iotlb_device)
return;
- spin_lock(&domain->lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&domain->lock, flags);
list_for_each_entry(info, &domain->devices, link)
__iommu_flush_dev_iotlb(info, addr, mask);
- spin_unlock(&domain->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&domain->lock, flags);
}
static void iommu_flush_iotlb_psi(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
@@ -2427,6 +2431,7 @@ static int domain_add_dev_info(struct dmar_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
{
struct device_domain_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
struct intel_iommu *iommu;
+ unsigned long flags;
u8 bus, devfn;
int ret;
@@ -2438,9 +2443,9 @@ static int domain_add_dev_info(struct dmar_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
if (ret)
return ret;
info->domain = domain;
- spin_lock(&domain->lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&domain->lock, flags);
list_add(&info->link, &domain->devices);
- spin_unlock(&domain->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&domain->lock, flags);
/* PASID table is mandatory for a PCI device in scalable mode. */
if (sm_supported(iommu) && !dev_is_real_dma_subdevice(dev)) {
@@ -4064,6 +4069,7 @@ static void dmar_remove_one_dev_info(struct device *dev)
struct device_domain_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
struct dmar_domain *domain = info->domain;
struct intel_iommu *iommu = info->iommu;
+ unsigned long flags;
if (!dev_is_real_dma_subdevice(info->dev)) {
if (dev_is_pci(info->dev) && sm_supported(iommu))
@@ -4075,9 +4081,9 @@ static void dmar_remove_one_dev_info(struct device *dev)
intel_pasid_free_table(info->dev);
}
- spin_lock(&domain->lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&domain->lock, flags);
list_del(&info->link);
- spin_unlock(&domain->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&domain->lock, flags);
domain_detach_iommu(domain, iommu);
info->domain = NULL;
@@ -4396,19 +4402,20 @@ static void domain_set_force_snooping(struct dmar_domain *domain)
static bool intel_iommu_enforce_cache_coherency(struct iommu_domain *domain)
{
struct dmar_domain *dmar_domain = to_dmar_domain(domain);
+ unsigned long flags;
if (dmar_domain->force_snooping)
return true;
- spin_lock(&dmar_domain->lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&dmar_domain->lock, flags);
if (!domain_support_force_snooping(dmar_domain)) {
- spin_unlock(&dmar_domain->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dmar_domain->lock, flags);
return false;
}
domain_set_force_snooping(dmar_domain);
dmar_domain->force_snooping = true;
- spin_unlock(&dmar_domain->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dmar_domain->lock, flags);
return true;
}
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists