[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <PH7PR84MB183888AC20B37A3D891C332D826A9@PH7PR84MB1838.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 20:22:58 +0000
From: "Kani, Toshi" <toshi.kani@....com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC: Justin He <Justin.He@....com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, James Morse <James.Morse@....com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
"Robert Richter" <rric@...nel.org>,
Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
"devel@...ica.org" <devel@...ica.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Shuai Xue <xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
"linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
nd <nd@....com>, "stable@...nel.org" <stable@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] EDAC/ghes: Modularize ghes_edac driver to remove the
dependency on ghes
On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 2:50 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 01:39:32AM +0000, Kani, Toshi wrote:
> > Yes, but the impact is not necessarily limited to these modules.
>
> The impact is limited only to the modules which would otherwise
> potentially load on a HP system which advertizes as "HPE ", "Server ".
>
> You're the only user of ghes_edac. So please state which drivers you
> want blocked from loading on those platforms and where ghes_edac should
> load instead.
ghes_edac is used on Arm. This original issue happened on a non-HPE
platform. I am not sure if this chipset-specific edac vs ghes_edac ordering
issue is x86-specific.
It may be safer to add the ghes check to edac_mc_add_mc_with_groups()
to keep it protected from any edac driver.
Toshi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists