[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yv1kePLTUJbJkpUW@monkey>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 14:58:16 -0700
From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc: "Wang, Haiyue" <haiyue.wang@...el.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"david@...hat.com" <david@...hat.com>,
"apopple@...dia.com" <apopple@...dia.com>,
"linmiaohe@...wei.com" <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
"songmuchun@...edance.com" <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
"naoya.horiguchi@...ux.dev" <naoya.horiguchi@...ux.dev>,
"alex.sierra@....com" <alex.sierra@....com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] mm: migration: fix the FOLL_GET failure on
following huge page
On 08/17/22 10:26, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> On 08/16/22 22:43, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 03:31:37 +0000 "Wang, Haiyue" <haiyue.wang@...el.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > }
> > > >
> > > > I would be better to fix this for real at those three client code sites?
> > >
> > > Then 5.19 will break for a while to wait for the final BIG patch ?
> >
> > If that's the proposal then your [1/2] should have had a cc:stable and
> > changelog words describing the plan for 6.0.
> >
> > But before we do that I'd like to see at least a prototype of the final
> > fixes to s390 and hugetlb, so we can assess those as preferable for
> > backporting. I don't think they'll be terribly intrusive or risky?
>
> I will start on adding follow_huge_pgd() support. Although, I may need
> some help with verification from the powerpc folks, as that is the only
> architecture which supports hugetlb pages at that level.
>
> mpe any suggestions?
>From 4925a98a6857dbb5a23bd97063ded2648863e65e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 14:32:10 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] hugetlb: make follow_huge_pgd support FOLL_GET
The existing version of follow_huge_pgd was very primitive and only
provided limited functionality. Specifically, it did not support
FOLL_GET. Update follow_huge_pgd with modifications similar to those
made for follow_huge_pud in commit 3a194f3f8ad0 ("mm/hugetlb: make
pud_huge() and follow_huge_pud() aware of non-present pud entry").
Note, common code should be factored out of follow_huge_p*d routines.
This will be done in future modifications.
Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
---
mm/hugetlb.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index ea1c7bfa1cc3..6f32d2bd1ca9 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -7055,10 +7055,38 @@ follow_huge_pud(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
struct page * __weak
follow_huge_pgd(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address, pgd_t *pgd, int flags)
{
- if (flags & (FOLL_GET | FOLL_PIN))
+ struct page *page = NULL;
+ spinlock_t *ptl;
+ pte_t pte;
+
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(flags & FOLL_PIN))
return NULL;
- return pte_page(*(pte_t *)pgd) + ((address & ~PGDIR_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
+retry:
+ ptl = huge_pte_lock(hstate_sizelog(PGDIR_SHIFT), mm, (pte_t *)pgd);
+ if (!pgd_huge(*pgd))
+ goto out;
+ pte = huge_ptep_get((pte_t *)pgd);
+ if (pte_present(pte)) {
+ page = pgd_page(*pgd) + ((address & ~PGDIR_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!try_grab_page(page, flags))) {
+ page = NULL;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ } else {
+ if (is_hugetlb_entry_migration(pte)) {
+ spin_unlock(ptl);
+ __migration_entry_wait(mm, (pte_t *)pgd, ptl);
+ goto retry;
+ }
+ /*
+ * hwpoisoned entry is treated as no_page_table in
+ * follow_page_mask().
+ */
+ }
+out:
+ spin_unlock(ptl);
+ return page;
}
int isolate_hugetlb(struct page *page, struct list_head *list)
--
2.37.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists