[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yv1wntznpzSXuTYh@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 19:50:06 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Sierra Guiza, Alejandro (Alex)" <alex.sierra@....com>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@....com>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] mm/gup.c: Refactor
check_and_migrate_movable_pages()
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 01:35:12PM -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
> How's this look to you:
>
> collected = collect_longterm_unpinnable_pages(&movable_page_list,
> nr_pages, pages);
> if (collected == 0)
> return 0;
>
> ret = migrate_longterm_unpinnable_pages(&movable_page_list, nr_pages,
> pages);
>
> /* If we got here, we have some unpinnable pages... */
>
> if (ret == 0) {
> /*
> * ...and we successfully migrated those pages. Which means that
> * the caller should retry the operation now.
> */
> ret = -EAGAIN;
return -EAGAIN
> }
>
> return ret;
But why return 0 from the helper function in the first place?
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists