[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yv18eGBvWKi3l/eW@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 20:40:40 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Sierra Guiza, Alejandro (Alex)" <alex.sierra@....com>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@....com>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] mm/gup.c: Refactor
check_and_migrate_movable_pages()
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 09:24:28AM +1000, Alistair Popple wrote:
> collected = collect_longterm_unpinnable_pages(&movable_page_list,
> nr_pages, pages);
> if (collected == 0)
> return 0;
>
> ret = migrate_longterm_unpinnable_pages(&movable_page_list, nr_pages,
> pages);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> return -EAGAIN;
>
> Which IMHO looks at lot more normal and sane than what I had.
That isn't "success oriented flow" :)
> > But why return 0 from the helper function in the first place?
>
> To stick with the paradigm of 0 == success. Ie.
But it doesn't mean success if we squashed it to EAGAIN here.
-EAGAIN == retry
0 == success, real success
everything else == -ERRNO, failure
Stick with one convection in all the functions in this file in this grouping.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists