[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yv2ASz3jGnoHh3ok@monkey>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 16:56:59 -0700
From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
To: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, songmuchun@...edance.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] mm/hugetlb: make detecting shared pte more reliable
On 08/16/22 21:05, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> If the pagetables are shared, we shouldn't copy or take references. Since
> src could have unshared and dst shares with another vma, huge_pte_none()
> is thus used to determine whether dst_pte is shared. But this check isn't
> reliable. A shared pte could have pte none in pagetable in fact. The page
> count of ptep page should be checked here in order to reliably determine
> whether pte is shared.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
> ---
> mm/hugetlb.c | 16 ++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
You are correct, this is a better/more reliable way to check for pmd sharing.
It is accurate since we hold i_mmap_rwsem. I like it.
Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
--
Mike Kravetz
Note to self, this will not work if we move to vma based locking for pmd
sharing and do not hold i_mmap_rwsem here.
>
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index e1356ad57087..25db6d07479e 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -4795,15 +4795,13 @@ int copy_hugetlb_page_range(struct mm_struct *dst, struct mm_struct *src,
>
> /*
> * If the pagetables are shared don't copy or take references.
> - * dst_pte == src_pte is the common case of src/dest sharing.
> *
> + * dst_pte == src_pte is the common case of src/dest sharing.
> * However, src could have 'unshared' and dst shares with
> - * another vma. If dst_pte !none, this implies sharing.
> - * Check here before taking page table lock, and once again
> - * after taking the lock below.
> + * another vma. So page_count of ptep page is checked instead
> + * to reliably determine whether pte is shared.
> */
> - dst_entry = huge_ptep_get(dst_pte);
> - if ((dst_pte == src_pte) || !huge_pte_none(dst_entry)) {
> + if (page_count(virt_to_page(dst_pte)) > 1) {
> addr |= last_addr_mask;
> continue;
> }
> @@ -4814,11 +4812,9 @@ int copy_hugetlb_page_range(struct mm_struct *dst, struct mm_struct *src,
> entry = huge_ptep_get(src_pte);
> dst_entry = huge_ptep_get(dst_pte);
> again:
> - if (huge_pte_none(entry) || !huge_pte_none(dst_entry)) {
> + if (huge_pte_none(entry)) {
> /*
> - * Skip if src entry none. Also, skip in the
> - * unlikely case dst entry !none as this implies
> - * sharing with another vma.
> + * Skip if src entry none.
> */
> ;
> } else if (unlikely(is_hugetlb_entry_hwpoisoned(entry))) {
> --
> 2.23.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists