[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220816224322.33e0dfbcbf522fcdc2026f0e@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 22:43:22 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Wang, Haiyue" <haiyue.wang@...el.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"david@...hat.com" <david@...hat.com>,
"apopple@...dia.com" <apopple@...dia.com>,
"linmiaohe@...wei.com" <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
"songmuchun@...edance.com" <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
"naoya.horiguchi@...ux.dev" <naoya.horiguchi@...ux.dev>,
"alex.sierra@....com" <alex.sierra@....com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] mm: migration: fix the FOLL_GET failure on
following huge page
On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 03:31:37 +0000 "Wang, Haiyue" <haiyue.wang@...el.com> wrote:
> > > }
> >
> > I would be better to fix this for real at those three client code sites?
>
> Then 5.19 will break for a while to wait for the final BIG patch ?
If that's the proposal then your [1/2] should have had a cc:stable and
changelog words describing the plan for 6.0.
But before we do that I'd like to see at least a prototype of the final
fixes to s390 and hugetlb, so we can assess those as preferable for
backporting. I don't think they'll be terribly intrusive or risky?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists