linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: net: ti: k3-am654-cpsw-nuss: Update bindings for J7200 CPSW5G

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 17 Aug 2022 13:11:04 +0530
From:   Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@...com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
CC:     <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
        <pabeni@...hat.com>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        <vladimir.oltean@....com>, <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
        <vigneshr@...com>, <nsekhar@...com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <kishon@...com>, <s-vadapalli@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: net: ti: k3-am654-cpsw-nuss: Update
 bindings for J7200 CPSW5G

Hello Krzysztof,

On 17/08/22 11:20, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 17/08/2022 08:14, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
> 
>>>> -      port@[1-2]:
>>>> +      "^port@[1-4]$":
>>>>          type: object
>>>>          description: CPSWxG NUSS external ports
>>>>  
>>>> @@ -119,7 +120,7 @@ properties:
>>>>          properties:
>>>>            reg:
>>>>              minimum: 1
>>>> -            maximum: 2
>>>> +            maximum: 4
>>>>              description: CPSW port number
>>>>  
>>>>            phys:
>>>> @@ -151,6 +152,18 @@ properties:
>>>>  
>>>>      additionalProperties: false
>>>>  
>>>> +if:
>>>
>>> This goes under allOf just before unevaluated/additionalProperties:false
>>
>> allOf was added by me in v3 series patch and it is not present in the
>> file. I removed it in v4 after Rob Herring's suggestion. Please let me
>> know if simply moving the if-then statements to the line above
>> additionalProperties:false would be fine.
> 
> I think Rob's comment was focusing not on using or not-using allOf, but
> on format of your entire if-then-else. Your v3 was huge and included
> allOf in wrong place).
> 
> Now you add if-then in proper place, but it is still advisable to put it
> with allOf, so if ever you grow the if-then by new entry, you do not
> have to change the indentation.
> 
> Anyway the location is not correct. Regardless if this is if-then or
> allOf-if-then, put it just like example schema is suggesting.

I will move the if-then statements to the lines above the
"additionalProperties: false" line. Also, I will add an allOf for this
single if-then statement in the v5 series.

Regards,
Siddharth.