| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 17:21:40 +0800
From: XU pengfei <xupengfei@...china.com>
To: song@...nel.org
Cc: linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
XU pengfei <xupengfei@...china.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] md/raid5: Fix spelling mistakes in comments
Fix spelling of 'waitting' in comments.
Signed-off-by: XU pengfei <xupengfei@...china.com>
---
drivers/md/raid5-cache.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c b/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c
index f4e1cc1ece43..058d82e7fa13 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c
@@ -1327,9 +1327,9 @@ static void r5l_write_super_and_discard_space(struct r5l_log *log,
* superblock is updated to new log tail. Updating superblock (either
* directly call md_update_sb() or depend on md thread) must hold
* reconfig mutex. On the other hand, raid5_quiesce is called with
- * reconfig_mutex hold. The first step of raid5_quiesce() is waitting
- * for all IO finish, hence waitting for reclaim thread, while reclaim
- * thread is calling this function and waitting for reconfig mutex. So
+ * reconfig_mutex hold. The first step of raid5_quiesce() is waiting
+ * for all IO finish, hence waiting for reclaim thread, while reclaim
+ * thread is calling this function and waiting for reconfig mutex. So
* there is a deadlock. We workaround this issue with a trylock.
* FIXME: we could miss discard if we can't take reconfig mutex
*/
--
2.18.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists