[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c3386d45-b643-b4aa-c868-5c113cd2955f@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 15:19:50 +0200
From: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@...el.com>
To: Icenowy Zheng <uwu@...nowy.me>
CC: <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...ux.intel.com>,
Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>,
Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@...ux.intel.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
"Jaroslav Kysela" <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: Intel: Skylake: try to get NHLT blob with PCM
params as fallback
On 2022-08-17 2:48 PM, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> 在 2022-08-16星期二的 21:08 +0200,Cezary Rojewski写道:
...
>
> Yes, it's Chell.
>
> BTW do you need other ACPI tables?
At this point, no. Thanks for confirming the platform's name.
>>
>> ..and at this point I probably know more than enough. We have tested
>> basically all of the KBL and AML configurations when fixing
>> regressions
>> during recent skylake-driver up-revs. But Chell (and Lars for that
>> matter) families were not among them as these are based on SKL. I'll
>> follow up on this with our partners and come back here. I'm almost
>> certain topology files for the two families mentioned were not
>> updated
>> along the way.
>
> Could this be an issue of Coreboot, which generates the NHLT table?
NHLT was left alone across all the updates. Updating it is one way of
fixing problems but I don't believe it's necessary in your case.
Topology update is more desirable approach.
> BTW I think Google pinned the official OS of this hardware to a much
> lower kernel version (but I don't want to use the official OS because
> of limited storage of Chell and lack of VM ability of the OS on Chell).
That clarifies things out. Guess the kernel version used there is v4.4
(plus a ton of un-upstreamed patches). Again, will propagate the
information up the chain. Perhaps one of the solutions for end-users
would be providing working UCM files to alsa-topology-conf repo so users
are not powerless in situations such as this one.
Regards,
Czarek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists