linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] dt-bindings: sram: sunxi-sram: Add optional regulators child

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <58851c87-9cea-8e48-1888-54d0b3237875@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 17 Aug 2022 16:22:48 +0300
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc:     Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] dt-bindings: sram: sunxi-sram: Add optional
 regulators child

On 17/08/2022 11:47, Samuel Holland wrote:
> On 8/16/22 4:59 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 15/08/2022 07:34, Samuel Holland wrote:
>>> Some sunxi SoCs have in-package regulators controlled by a register in
>>> the system control MMIO block. Allow a child node for these regulators
>>> in addition to SRAM child nodes.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Changes in v3:
>>>  - Require the regulators node to have a unit address
>>>  - Reference the regulator schema from the SRAM controller schema
>>>  - Move the system LDOs example to the SRAM controller schema
>>>  - Reorder the patches so the example passes validation
>>>
>>> Changes in v2:
>>>  - New patch for v2
>>>
>>>  .../allwinner,sun4i-a10-system-control.yaml   | 29 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/allwinner,sun4i-a10-system-control.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/allwinner,sun4i-a10-system-control.yaml
>>> index d64c1b28fb61..915ca85c3f10 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/allwinner,sun4i-a10-system-control.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/allwinner,sun4i-a10-system-control.yaml
>>> @@ -56,6 +56,10 @@ properties:
>>>    ranges: true
>>>  
>>>  patternProperties:
>>> +  "^regulators@[0-9a-f]+$":
>>> +    $ref: /schemas/regulator/allwinner,sun20i-d1-system-ldos.yaml#
>>> +    unevaluatedProperties: false
>>
>> unevaluatedProperties is not needed. Your other schema does not allow
>> anything else here.
> 
> I can remove it. I added it because it looks like the dt-schema tools use it as
> an indicator that the matched properties are child nodes[1]. Maybe that is not
> relevant here?

It is not relevant here as the other schema does not allow anything else.

Best regards,
Krzysztof