linux-kernel - Re: [ata] 0568e61225: stress-ng.copy-file.ops_per

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <743867a6-b266-58e4-a8a6-542757916f0a@huawei.com>
Date:   Wed, 17 Aug 2022 15:04:06 +0100
From:   John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To:     Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@...el.com>
CC:     Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>, <lkp@...ts.01.org>, <lkp@...el.com>,
        <ying.huang@...el.com>, <feng.tang@...el.com>,
        <zhengjun.xing@...ux.intel.com>, <fengwei.yin@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [ata] 0568e61225: stress-ng.copy-file.ops_per_sec -15.0%
 regression

On 17/08/2022 14:51, Oliver Sang wrote:

Hi Oliver,

>> v5.19 + 0568e61225 : 512/512
>> v5.19 + 0568e61225 + 4cbfca5f77 : 512/512
>> v5.19: 1280/32767
>>
>> They are want makes sense to me, at least.
>>
>> Oliver, can you confirm this? Thanks!
> I confirm below two:
> v5.19 + 0568e61225 : 512/512
> v5.19: 1280/32767 (as last already reported)

ack

> 
> but below failed to build:
> v5.19 + 0568e61225 + 4cbfca5f77
> 
> build_errors:
>    - "drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_sas.c:242:33: error: implicit declaration of function 'dma_opt_mapping_size'; did you mean 'dma_max_mapping_size'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]"
>    - "drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_sas.c:241:24: error: 'struct Scsi_Host' has no member named 'opt_sectors'; did you mean 'max_sectors'?"
> 
> not sure if I understand this correctly?
> for this, I just cherry-pick 0568e61225 upon v5.19,
> then cherry-pick 4cbfca5f77 again.
> so my branch looks like:
> 
> a11d8b97c3ecb8 v5.19 + 0568e61225 + 4cbfca5f77
> 1b59440cf71f99 v5.19 + 0568e61225
> 3d7cb6b04c3f31 (tag: v5.19,
> 
> did I do the right thing?

Sorry but I was not really interested in 4cbfca5f77 and I see where that 
build error is coming, but don't be concerned with it. However, for 
avoidance of doubt, if you have results for vanilla v6.0-rc1 then that 
would be appreciated.

I will also send a separate patch for testing if you don't mind.

thanks,
John