linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: memcg: export workingset refault stats for cgroup v1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 16 Aug 2022 19:01:11 -0700
From:   Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
To:     Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
Cc:     Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
        Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: memcg: export workingset refault stats for cgroup v1

On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 3:06 PM Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 11:58 AM Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > Workingset refault stats are important and usefule metrics to measure
> > how well reclaimer and swapping work and how healthy the services are,
> > but they are just available for cgroup v2.  There are still plenty users
> > with cgroup v1, export the stats for cgroup v1.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
> > ---
> > I do understand the development of cgroup v1 is actually stalled and
> > the community is reluctant to accept new features for v1.  However
> > the workingset refault stats are really quite useful and exporting
> > two new stats, which have been supported by v2, seems ok IMHO.  So
> > hopefully this patch could be considered.  Thanks.
> >
>
> Is just workingset refault good enough for your use-case? What about
> the other workingset stats? I don't have a strong opinion against
> adding these to v1 and I think these specific stats should be fine.

The workingset refault is good enough for our usercase, but I don't
mind adding all the workingset_* stats if nobody has objection.

> (There is subtlety in exposing objcg based stats (i.e. reparenting) in
> v1 due to non-hierarchical stats in v1. I remember Yosry and Muchun
> were looking into that.)

The workingset_* stats should have nothing to do with obj based stats IIUC.