linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.18 0000/1094] 5.18.18-rc2 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220817152446.GA1205420@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Wed, 17 Aug 2022 08:24:46 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        slade@...dewatkins.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.18 0000/1094] 5.18.18-rc2 review

On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 03:34:09PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 09:24:45PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 02:59:27PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.18 release.
> > > There are 1094 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > > 
> > > Responses should be made by Thu, 18 Aug 2022 12:43:14 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > 
> > Build results:
> > 	total: 154 pass: 154 fail: 0
> > Qemu test results:
> > 	total: 481 pass: 480 fail: 1
> > Failed tests:
> > 	arm:bletchley-bmc:aspeed_g5_defconfig:notests:usb0:net,nic:aspeed-bmc-facebook-bletchley:rootfs
> > 
> > The failing boot test is new and not a concern. I'll see if I can figure
> > out why it fails. If it is too difficult to fix (for example because 5.18
> > simply doesn't support usb on bletchley-bmc), I'll just skip it next time.
> > 
> > Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> 
> 5.18 is only going to be alive for one more week at most, so I wouldn't
> worry too much about this.
> 

Ok, I'll just leave it alone.

Thanks,
Guenter