linux-kernel - Re: [Intel-wired-lan] ice: Error setting promisc mode on VSI 6 (rc=-17) @ 5.18.x

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 17 Aug 2022 08:59:01 -0700
From:   Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
To:     Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>,
        "Wilczynski, Michal" <michal.wilczynski@...el.com>,
        Jaroslav Pulchart <jaroslav.pulchart@...ddata.com>,
        "Siwik, Grzegorz" <grzegorz.siwik@...el.com>,
        "Kitszel, Przemyslaw" <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>
CC:     "regressions@...ts.linux.dev" <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
        <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
        Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] ice: Error setting promisc mode on VSI 6
 (rc=-17) @ 5.18.x

On 8/17/2022 2:08 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 05.07.22 15:51, Wilczynski, Michal wrote:
>>
>> Adding Grzegorz Siwik,  since he is working on similar issue and already
>> has a patch that is being tested/reviewed internally at the moment.
>>
>> He can you a send patch tomorrow so you can test if it also fixes your
>> problem.
> 
> Tony, Jesse, I have to wonder: why is it taken so long to get this
> regression fixed? The regression was reported 69 days ago and the first
> patches to fix this went out 40 days ago. That's far from ideal.

Hi Thorsten,

Our validation found issues when testing the original fix which caused 
the delays as the new issues were being worked out.

> Reminder: this regression ideally should have been fixed within two
> weeks after the report, as explained here:
> https://docs.kernel.org/process/handling-regressions.html
> 
> FWIW, in case anyone wonders: the latest patch-series to fix this can be
> found here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/intel-wired-lan/1660310750-290943-1-git-send-email-grzegorz.siwik@intel.com/

I was going to point you to the newest patches, but you located them. 
Our validation finished testing them yesterday so the pull request for 
these will be going out to netdev today.

Thanks,
Tony