linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] Documentation: KUnit: minor fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <03535c9e-d3e7-eeca-2650-2ecf7ab4c34e@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 18 Aug 2022 15:20:48 -0300
From:   Tales Lelo da Aparecida <tales.aparecida@...il.com>
To:     Sadiya Kazi <sadiyakazi@...gle.com>,
        David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Cc:     Trevor Woerner <twoerner@...il.com>, siqueirajordao@...eup.net,
        mwen@...lia.com, andrealmeid@...eup.net, mairacanal@...eup.net,
        Isabella Basso <isabbasso@...eup.net>, magalilemes00@...il.com,
        kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        brendanhiggins@...gle.com, corbet@....net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Documentation: KUnit: minor fixes

On 13/08/2022 01:20, Tales Aparecida wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This is a short series of minor fixes to the Kunit documentation,
> they probably can be squashed but I suppose it's easier
> to review them individually.
> 
> Thanks for any feedbacks,
> Tales
> 
> Tales Aparecida (4):
>    Documentation: kunit: fix trivial typo
>    Documentation: Kunit: Fix inconsistent titles
>    Documentation: KUnit: Fix non-uml anchor
>    Documentation: Kunit: Add ref for other kinds of tests
> 
>   Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/architecture.rst | 4 ++--
>   Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/faq.rst          | 8 +++++---
>   Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/index.rst        | 2 ++
>   Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst  | 4 +++-
>   Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst        | 4 ++--
>   5 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 

Hello,

Thanks for the reviews, everyone!
Should I send a V2 with squashed commits or will a committer handle that?

Kind regards,
Tales