linux-kernel - Re: bpf selftest failed in 5.4.210 kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPXMrf-E0di5=0RpNRXUEF3VRtQNSqoaAZ9bzGq9jMtiQ3xgXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 18 Aug 2022 21:33:47 +0300
From:   RAJESH DASARI <raajeshdasari@...il.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        jean-philippe@...aro.org, df@...gle.com
Subject: Re: bpf selftest failed in 5.4.210 kernel

I tried with git bisect between v5.4.210(bad) and v5.4.209(good).
Everytime I did bisect I compiled the kernel , booted my instance with
the new kernel and ran the selftests after trying out for 3 times ,
git bisect pointed to the  below commit as a first bad commit.

git bisect bad
9d6f67365d9cdb389fbdac2bb5b00e59e345930e is the first bad commit
commit 9d6f67365d9cdb389fbdac2bb5b00e59e345930e
Author: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Date:   Wed Aug 3 17:50:03 2022 +0300

    bpf: Test_verifier, #70 error message updates for 32-bit right shift

Thanks,
Rajesh Dasari.

On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 8:24 AM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 09:22:00PM +0300, RAJESH DASARI wrote:
> > Hi ,
> >
> > We are running bpf selftests on 5.4.210 kernel version and we see that
> > test case 11 of  test_align failed. Please find the below error.
> >
> > selftests: bpf: test_align
> > Test  11: pointer variable subtraction ... Failed to find match 16:
> > R5_w=pkt(id=2,off=0,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=1082,var_off=(0x2;
> > 0xfffffffc)
> > # func#0 @0
> > # 0: R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
> > # 0: (61) r2 = *(u32 *)(r1 +76)
> > # 1: R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R2_w=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
> > # 1: (61) r3 = *(u32 *)(r1 +80)
> >
> > For complete errors please see the attached file. The same test case
> > execution was successful in the 5.4.209 version , could you please let
> > me know any known issue with the recent changes in 5.4.210 and how to
> > fix these errors.
>
> Can you use 'git bisect' to find the offending commit?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h