linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86: make pat and mtrr independent from each other

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <464f9f88-232d-4fa1-bc43-916ff7045f4e@netscape.net>
Date:   Thu, 18 Aug 2022 14:54:17 -0400
From:   Chuck Zmudzinski <brchuckz@...scape.net>
To:     Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>
Cc:     jbeulich@...e.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
        regressions@...ts.linux.dev, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
        x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86: make pat and mtrr independent from each other

On 8/16/22 1:28 PM, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> On 8/16/2022 12:53 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>
> >
> > regzbot will notice when the patch hit's Linux next,
>
> IIUC, regzbot might not notice because the patch lacks a Link: tag
> to the original regression report. The Link tag is to Jan's patch
> that was posted sometime in April, I think, which also lacks the
> Link tag to the original report of the regression which did not
> happen until May 4. If regzbot is smart enough to notice that the
> patch also has a Fixes: tag for the commit that was identified as
> bad in the original regression report, then I expect regzbot will
> find it.

Hey, I see the patch hit linux-next and regzbot noticed and
now lists the patch as an incoming fix. Great job with regzbot!

By the way, I think regzbot is a great idea, and I think any resources
devoted to develop it more would pay handsome returns for the
quality of Linux. If no one but you is working on it, I actually might
be willing to volunteer some time to help you develop it.

Best regards,

Chuck