[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VecURpGCBY3WVKqhd64Ngobjvi-w=PuHQBH2V-MqCzkuw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 22:10:58 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Marek Behún <kabel@...nel.org>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
Linux Phy <linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>,
josef.schlehofer@....cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-phy v2 1/4] string.h: Add str_has_proper_prefix()
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 11:06 PM Marek Behún <kabel@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Add str_has_proper_prefix(), similar to str_has_prefix(), but requires
> that the prefix is proper: the string itself must be longer than the
> prefix.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Behún <kabel@...nel.org>
> ---
> Andy, Kees, could you ack this if it is ok?
Seems to me there are too many strlen():s. One is hidden in strncmp().
Besides not the good naming (what 'proper' means), the entire function
is not needed. You may simply call
str_has_prefix() && p[len] != '\0';
Correct?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists