linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v1 4/7] i2c-mlxbf.c: incorrect base address passed during io write

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 18 Aug 2022 20:30:13 +0000
From:   Asmaa Mnebhi <asmaa@...dia.com>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
CC:     "linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Khalil Blaiech <kblaiech@...dia.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v1 4/7] i2c-mlxbf.c: incorrect base address passed during
 io write

Sure!

-----Original Message-----
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org> 
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2022 4:24 PM
To: Asmaa Mnebhi <asmaa@...dia.com>
Cc: linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Khalil Blaiech <kblaiech@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/7] i2c-mlxbf.c: incorrect base address passed during io write


Thanks for the heads up.

> didn't have any impact on the overall functionality of the read/write transactions. Writing to smbus->io + 0x18 (aka  MLXBF_I2C_CAUSE_OR_CLEAR) corresponds to sc_low_timeout register which sets the timeout value before a read/write transaction aborts. 

I understand. Could we have the above sentences (or something similar) in the commit message then?