[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yv6v+L+/KyJrLtFk@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 23:32:40 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...o.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Alexandru Marginean <alexandru.marginean@....com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bhadram Varka <vbhadram@...dia.com>,
Camelia Alexandra Groza <camelia.groza@....com>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@....com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] net: phy: Add support for rate adaptation
> I have some other series [1,2] which have also received little-to-no feedback. Should
> I resend those as well? I didn't ping about these earlier because there was a merge
> window open, and e.g. gregkh has told me not to ping at that time (since series will
> be reviewed afterwards). Should I be pinging sooner on netdev?
For netdev, you need to resend after the merge window. Other
subsystems might look at older patch, and if they apply cleanly might
merge them. But not netdev.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists