lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50ce72e61bab598a04714910ec7373818a006035.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Thu, 18 Aug 2022 00:35:57 -0400
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Matthias May <matthias.may@...termo.com>, apw@...onical.com,
        dwaipayanray1@...il.com, lukas.bulwahn@...il.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: False-positive in Checkpatch

On Wed, 2022-08-17 at 10:29 +0200, Matthias May wrote:
> Hi Checkpatch Maintainers
> 
> The selftest patch at
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20220817073649.26117-1-matthias.may@westermo.com/T/#u
> claims too long lines.
> However this seems to be a misinterpretation of the indention before the printf split over 2
> lines to exactly not have too long lines.
> The false positive checkpatch results are also on the netdev patchwork:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20220817073649.26117-1-matthias.may@westermo.com/

Each character in the boxing output is actually 3 ascii characters.
checkpatch doesn't interpret unicode within character strings.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ