linux-kernel - Re: False-positive in Checkpatch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 18 Aug 2022 00:35:57 -0400
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Matthias May <matthias.may@...termo.com>, apw@...onical.com,
        dwaipayanray1@...il.com, lukas.bulwahn@...il.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: False-positive in Checkpatch

On Wed, 2022-08-17 at 10:29 +0200, Matthias May wrote:
> Hi Checkpatch Maintainers
> 
> The selftest patch at
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20220817073649.26117-1-matthias.may@westermo.com/T/#u
> claims too long lines.
> However this seems to be a misinterpretation of the indention before the printf split over 2
> lines to exactly not have too long lines.
> The false positive checkpatch results are also on the netdev patchwork:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20220817073649.26117-1-matthias.may@westermo.com/

Each character in the boxing output is actually 3 ascii characters.
checkpatch doesn't interpret unicode within character strings.