linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] Revert "mlxsw: core: Add the hottest thermal zone detection"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5008ef00-6e64-ca89-7ff0-0bcf85bd4b54@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 18 Aug 2022 09:23:09 +0200
From:   Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
Cc:     rafael@...nel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, vadimp@...lanox.com,
        davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vadimp@...dia.com, petrm@...dia.com,
        edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] Revert "mlxsw: core: Add the hottest thermal zone
 detection"

On 17/08/2022 20:21, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 19:11:12 +0300 Ido Schimmel wrote:
>> Jakub, Daniel wants to route this patch via his tree. Do you mind?
>> I spoke with Vadim earlier this week and we do not expect changes to
>> this file during the current cycle.
> 
> I don't understand why this couldn't have gotten in during the merge
> window for 6.0, avoiding the risk of conflicts. But yeah, you said
> conflicts are unlikely here anyway, so no objections:
> 
> Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>

Applied, thanks

-- 
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog