[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1ee8458c-9200-7ad8-8497-a142df2bbe0b@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 19:02:46 +0800
From: Sun Ke <sunke32@...wei.com>
To: JeffleXu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>, <dhowells@...hat.com>
CC: <linux-cachefs@...hat.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cachefiles: fix error return code in
cachefiles_ondemand_copen()
在 2022/8/18 18:47, JeffleXu 写道:
>
>
> On 8/18/22 5:49 PM, Sun Ke wrote:
>> If size < 0; open request will fail, but cachefiles_ondemand_copen return 0.
>
> Hi, this is a deliberate design. The cache_size field of copen is
> specified by the user daemon. If cache_size < 0, then the OPEN request
> is expected to fail, while copen itself shall succeed.
>
>> Fix to return a negative error code.
>>
>> Fixes: c8383054506c ("cachefiles: notify the user daemon when looking up cookie")
>> Signed-off-by: Sun Ke <sunke32@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c b/fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c
>> index 1fee702d5529..a31d3ff0ce5f 100644
>> --- a/fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c
>> +++ b/fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c
>> @@ -161,6 +161,7 @@ int cachefiles_ondemand_copen(struct cachefiles_cache *cache, char *args)
>> if (!IS_ERR_VALUE(size))
>> size = -EINVAL;
>
> However, it is indeed unexpected when cache_size is an invalid error
> code. How about:
>
> if (!IS_ERR_VALUE(size))
> - size= -EINVAL;
> + ret = size = -EINVAL;
> req->error = size;
> goto out;
> }
OK, I will send a v2 patch.
Thanks,
Sun Ke
>
>> req->error = size;
>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>> goto out;
>> }
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists