[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c0de76f1-6b8e-2fc0-a7e7-5d2c29df4509@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 19:55:28 +0800
From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
Jacob jun Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@...aro.org>,
Zhu Tony <tony.zhu@...el.com>, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 04/13] PCI: Allow PASID only when ACS enforced on
upstreaming path
On 2022/8/18 06:48, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 04:17:43PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
>> Does the PCIe spec really allow TLPs with PASID to be routed anywhere
>> except upstream?
> I think yes:
>
> 2.2.10.2 End-End TLP Prefix Processing:
>
> The presence of an End-End TLP Prefix does not alter the routing of a
> TLP. TLPs are routed based on the routing rules covered in Section
> 2.2.4 .
>
> Which I read as saying that routing is done after stripping all the
> prefixes. PASID is a prefix.
>
> Lu, you may want to quote the spec in the commit message to make it
> clear.
Yes. Sure thing. Thank you!
Best regards,
baolu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists