lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 18 Aug 2022 13:57:47 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Saurabh Singh Sengar <ssengar@...ux.microsoft.com>
Cc:     ssengar@...rosoft.com, mikelley@...rosoft.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
        mingo@...hat.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org,
        hpa@...or.com, peterz@...radead.org, tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com,
        will@...nel.org, song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com,
        suravee.suthikulpanit@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/cacheinfo: Don't use cpu_llc_shared_map for
 !CONFIG_SMP

On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 09:52:25PM -0700, Saurabh Singh Sengar wrote:
> Shall I mention here "Non-SMP AMD processor" instead ?

You should explain what that is.

Is that a CONFIG_SMP=n kernel which you boot on a AMD CPU?

IOW, how do I reproduce the issue you're describing below, here locally?

Send dmesg pls.

Also, what is the use case?

Why would you even build with SMP off?

Feel free to explain more verbosely what you're trying to accomplish.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ