lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220818131042.113280-10-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Thu, 18 Aug 2022 18:40:41 +0530
From:   "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     linux-mm@...ck.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:     Wei Xu <weixugc@...gle.com>, Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
        Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
        Tim C Chen <tim.c.chen@...el.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Hesham Almatary <hesham.almatary@...wei.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, jvgediya.oss@...il.com,
        Bharata B Rao <bharata@....com>,
        "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v15 09/10] mm/demotion: Update node_is_toptier to work with memory tiers

With memory tier support we can have memory only NUMA nodes
in the top tier from which we want to avoid promotion tracking NUMA
faults. Update node_is_toptier to work with memory tiers.
All NUMA nodes are by default top tier nodes. With lower(slower) memory
tiers added we consider all memory tiers above a memory tier having
CPU NUMA nodes as a top memory tier

Reviewed-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>
---
 include/linux/memory-tiers.h | 11 +++++++++
 include/linux/node.h         |  5 ----
 mm/huge_memory.c             |  1 +
 mm/memory-tiers.c            | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 mm/migrate.c                 |  1 +
 mm/mprotect.c                |  1 +
 6 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/memory-tiers.h b/include/linux/memory-tiers.h
index a2f8f4c250b9..1592d374b5bf 100644
--- a/include/linux/memory-tiers.h
+++ b/include/linux/memory-tiers.h
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ void clear_node_memory_type(int node, struct memory_dev_type *memtype);
 #ifdef CONFIG_MIGRATION
 int next_demotion_node(int node);
 void node_get_allowed_targets(pg_data_t *pgdat, nodemask_t *targets);
+bool node_is_toptier(int node);
 #else
 static inline int next_demotion_node(int node)
 {
@@ -50,6 +51,11 @@ static inline void node_get_allowed_targets(pg_data_t *pgdat, nodemask_t *target
 {
 	*targets = NODE_MASK_NONE;
 }
+
+static inline bool node_is_toptier(int node)
+{
+	return true;
+}
 #endif
 
 #else
@@ -87,5 +93,10 @@ static inline void node_get_allowed_targets(pg_data_t *pgdat, nodemask_t *target
 {
 	*targets = NODE_MASK_NONE;
 }
+
+static inline bool node_is_toptier(int node)
+{
+	return true;
+}
 #endif	/* CONFIG_NUMA */
 #endif  /* _LINUX_MEMORY_TIERS_H */
diff --git a/include/linux/node.h b/include/linux/node.h
index 40d641a8bfb0..9ec680dd607f 100644
--- a/include/linux/node.h
+++ b/include/linux/node.h
@@ -185,9 +185,4 @@ static inline void register_hugetlbfs_with_node(node_registration_func_t reg,
 
 #define to_node(device) container_of(device, struct node, dev)
 
-static inline bool node_is_toptier(int node)
-{
-	return node_state(node, N_CPU);
-}
-
 #endif /* _LINUX_NODE_H_ */
diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index 8a7c1b344abe..1e9357576f2d 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
 #include <linux/numa.h>
 #include <linux/page_owner.h>
 #include <linux/sched/sysctl.h>
+#include <linux/memory-tiers.h>
 
 #include <asm/tlb.h>
 #include <asm/pgalloc.h>
diff --git a/mm/memory-tiers.c b/mm/memory-tiers.c
index 89b9f317be99..a20795bb0e07 100644
--- a/mm/memory-tiers.c
+++ b/mm/memory-tiers.c
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ static LIST_HEAD(memory_tiers);
 static struct memory_dev_type *node_memory_types[MAX_NUMNODES];
 static struct memory_dev_type *default_dram_type;
 #ifdef CONFIG_MIGRATION
+static int top_tier_adistance;
 /*
  * node_demotion[] examples:
  *
@@ -157,6 +158,31 @@ static struct memory_tier *__node_get_memory_tier(int node)
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_MIGRATION
+bool node_is_toptier(int node)
+{
+	bool toptier;
+	pg_data_t *pgdat;
+	struct memory_tier *memtier;
+
+	pgdat = NODE_DATA(node);
+	if (!pgdat)
+		return false;
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	memtier = rcu_dereference(pgdat->memtier);
+	if (!memtier) {
+		toptier = true;
+		goto out;
+	}
+	if (memtier->adistance_start < top_tier_adistance)
+		toptier = true;
+	else
+		toptier = false;
+out:
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+	return toptier;
+}
+
 void node_get_allowed_targets(pg_data_t *pgdat, nodemask_t *targets)
 {
 	struct memory_tier *memtier;
@@ -314,6 +340,26 @@ static void establish_demotion_targets(void)
 			}
 		} while (1);
 	}
+	/*
+	 * Promotion is allowed from a memory tier to higher
+	 * memory tier only if the memory tier doesn't include
+	 * compute. We want to skip promotion from a memory tier,
+	 * if any node that is part of the memory tier have CPUs.
+	 * Once we detect such a memory tier, we consider that tier
+	 * as top tiper from which promotion is not allowed.
+	 */
+	list_for_each_entry_reverse(memtier, &memory_tiers, list) {
+		tier_nodes = get_memtier_nodemask(memtier);
+		nodes_and(tier_nodes, node_states[N_CPU], tier_nodes);
+		if (!nodes_empty(tier_nodes)) {
+			/*
+			 * abstract distance below the max value of this memtier
+			 * is considered toptier.
+			 */
+			top_tier_adistance = memtier->adistance_start + MEMTIER_CHUNK_SIZE;
+			break;
+		}
+	}
 	/*
 	 * Now build the lower_tier mask for each node collecting node mask from
 	 * all memory tier below it. This allows us to fallback demotion page
diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
index ea86594f4bc5..55e7718cfe45 100644
--- a/mm/migrate.c
+++ b/mm/migrate.c
@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@
 #include <linux/memory.h>
 #include <linux/random.h>
 #include <linux/sched/sysctl.h>
+#include <linux/memory-tiers.h>
 
 #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
 
diff --git a/mm/mprotect.c b/mm/mprotect.c
index 3a23dde73723..61cd80831b04 100644
--- a/mm/mprotect.c
+++ b/mm/mprotect.c
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
 #include <linux/pgtable.h>
 #include <linux/sched/sysctl.h>
 #include <linux/userfaultfd_k.h>
+#include <linux/memory-tiers.h>
 #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
 #include <asm/mmu_context.h>
 #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
-- 
2.37.2

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ