[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2026286.1660828477@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 14:14:37 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@...hat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
Anna Schumaker <anna@...nel.org>,
Scott Mayhew <smayhew@...hat.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
linux-nfs <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
SElinux list <selinux@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Security Module list
<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
dwysocha@...hat.com,
Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] nfs: Fix automount superblock LSM init problem, preventing sb sharing
Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com> wrote:
> I guess my question is this: for inodes inside the superblock, does
> their superblock pointer point to the submount's superblock, or the
> parent filesystem's superblock?
They have to point to the submount superblock. Too many things would break, I
think, if inode->i_sb pointed to the wrong place. As far as the VFS is
concerned, apart from the way it is mounted, it's a perfectly normal
superblock.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists