linux-kernel - Re: stalling IO regression since linux 5.12, through 5.18

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <aadeb600-4e3a-4b69-bc17-fd2918c5b061@www.fastmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 18 Aug 2022 09:50:07 -0400
From:   "Chris Murphy" <lists@...orremedies.com>
To:     "Ming Lei" <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Cc:     "Nikolay Borisov" <nborisov@...e.com>,
        "Jens Axboe" <axboe@...nel.dk>, "Jan Kara" <jack@...e.cz>,
        "Paolo Valente" <paolo.valente@...aro.org>,
        "Btrfs BTRFS" <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-RAID <linux-raid@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Josef Bacik" <josef@...icpanda.com>
Subject: Re: stalling IO regression since linux 5.12, through 5.18



On Thu, Aug 18, 2022, at 1:24 AM, Ming Lei wrote:

>
> Also please test the following one too:
>
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index 5ee62b95f3e5..d01c64be08e2 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -1991,7 +1991,8 @@ bool blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx 
> *hctx, struct list_head *list,
>  		if (!needs_restart ||
>  		    (no_tag && list_empty_careful(&hctx->dispatch_wait.entry)))
>  			blk_mq_run_hw_queue(hctx, true);
> -		else if (needs_restart && needs_resource)
> +		else if (needs_restart && (needs_resource ||
> +					blk_mq_is_shared_tags(hctx->flags)))
>  			blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue(hctx, BLK_MQ_RESOURCE_DELAY);
> 
>  		blk_mq_update_dispatch_busy(hctx, true);
>

Should I test both patches at the same time, or separately? On top of v5.17 clean, or with b6e68ee82585 still reverted?

-- 
Chris Murphy