[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c4c37505-0320-2a00-0f8f-0490f39486ff@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 19:22:26 +0530
From: Aneesh Kumar K V <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>
To: linux-mm@...ck.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: Wei Xu <weixugc@...gle.com>, Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Tim C Chen <tim.c.chen@...el.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hesham Almatary <hesham.almatary@...wei.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, jvgediya.oss@...il.com,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 01/10] mm/demotion: Add support for explicit memory
tiers
On 8/18/22 6:40 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> + */
> +#define MEMTIER_CHUNK_BITS 7
> +#define MEMTIER_CHUNK_SIZE (1 << MEMTIER_CHUNK_BITS)
> +/*
> + * Smaller abstract distance values imply faster(higher) memory tiers. Offset
> + * the DRAM adistance so that we can accommodate devices with a slightly lower
> + * adistance value (slightly slower) than default DRAM adistance to be part of
(^^^ slightly faster)
> + * the same memory tier.
> + */
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists