lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yv5IfiwqGumJwVGT@kroah.com>
Date:   Thu, 18 Aug 2022 16:11:10 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
        Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
        linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
        lkp@...el.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] kallsyms: add option to include relative
 filepaths into kallsyms

On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 03:56:29PM +0200, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 14:23:43 +0200
> 
> > On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 01:53:06PM +0200, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> > > Currently, kallsyms kernel code copes with symbols with the same
> > > name by indexing them according to their position in vmlinux and
> > > requiring to provide an index of the desired symbol. This is not
> > > really quite reliable and is fragile to any features performing
> > > symbol or section manipulations such as FG-KASLR.
> > 
> > Ah, here's the reasoning, stuff like this should go into the 0/X message
> > too, right?
> > 
> > Anyway, what is currently broken that requires this?  What will this
> > make easier in the future?  What in the future will depend on this?
> 
> 2) FG-KASLR will depend and probably some more crazy hardening
>    stuff. And/or perf-based function/symbol placement, which is
>    in the "discuss and dream sometimes" stage.

I have no idea what "FG-KASLR" is.  Why not submit these changes when
whatever that is is ready for submission?

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ