lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=UXFiA4hW8_cmO0Di-NCpqvkjTqqOfbc6DfD5Rs8aT6hA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 18 Aug 2022 08:03:24 -0700
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:     Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>
Cc:     Rock Chiu <rock.chiu@...adetech.corp-partner.google.com>,
        Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
        Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>,
        Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: ps8640: Add double reset T4 and T5 to
 power-on sequence

Hi,

On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 8:22 PM Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 11:19 AM Rock Chiu
> <rock.chiu@...adetech.corp-partner.google.com> wrote:
> >
> > How does T4/T5  impact the real case? We talked previously the T4/T5
> > shouldn't cause user impact.
> > Do we have testing data from ODM?
> >
> Please leave comments below the previous comment's headline.
>
> I'm confused. The reason I upstreamed this patch is because this is in
> your application note and you asked us to help upstream it. Now do you
> mean that we don't need T4 and T5?

I think Rock is asking what problems the extra delay is causing. In
other words: why do we care about keeping these delays short?

The answer is that it affects boot speed and also resume speed of
devices. Adding these two delays here means that there's an extra 100
ms before the user can see something on the screen. That may not seem
like a lot, but those kinds of delays add up quickly. At least on
Chromebooks, booting quickly is always a big goal.

-Doug

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ