lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 18 Aug 2022 16:23:05 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@...labora.com>,
        Sanjay R Mehta <sanju.mehta@....com>
Cc:     kernel@...labora.com, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: amd: Setup all xfers before opcode execution

On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 04:00:59 +0300, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
> The AMD SPI controller hardware seems to expect the FIFO buffer to be
> fully setup with the details of all transfers in the SPI message before
> it is able to start processing the data in a reliable way.
> 
> Furthermore, it imposes a strict ordering restriction, in the sense that
> all TX transfers must be handled prior any RX transfer.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] spi: amd: Setup all xfers before opcode execution
      commit: 9d08f700ab78fd96cbe5922c261051743cb9c86e

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ