lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 17:43:53 +0100 From: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com> To: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Barry Song <song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com>, Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>, Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] sched, net: NUMA-aware CPU spreading interface On 18/08/22 09:28, Jesse Brandeburg wrote: > On 8/17/2022 10:58 AM, Valentin Schneider wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> Tariq pointed out in [1] that drivers allocating IRQ vectors would benefit >> from having smarter NUMA-awareness (cpumask_local_spread() doesn't quite cut >> it). >> >> The proposed interface involved an array of CPUs and a temporary cpumask, and >> being my difficult self what I'm proposing here is an interface that doesn't >> require any temporary storage other than some stack variables (at the cost of >> one wild macro). >> >> Patch 5/5 is just there to showcase how the thing would be used. If this doesn't >> get hated on, I'll let Tariq pick this up and push it with his networking driver >> changes (with actual changelogs). > > I am interested in this work, but it seems that at least on lore and in > my inbox, patch 3,4,5 didn't show up. I used exactly the same git send-email command for this than for v1 (which shows up in its entirety on lore), but I can't see these either. I'm going to assume they got lost and will resend them.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists