[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <8EC06FE1-3963-4F22-83DF-48B3EFAA62CA@linux.dev>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 11:31:30 +0800
From: Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>
To: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@...wei.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] bootmem: remove the vmemmap pages from kmemleak in
free_bootmem_page
> On Aug 18, 2022, at 21:21, Liu Shixin <liushixin2@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> The vmemmap pages is marked by kmemleak when allocated from memblock.
> Remove it from kmemleak when free the page. Otherwise, when we reuse the
> page, kmemleak may report such an error and then stop working.
>
> kmemleak: Cannot insert 0xffff98fb6eab3d40 into the object search tree (overlaps existing)
> kmemleak: Kernel memory leak detector disabled
> kmemleak: Object 0xffff98fb6be00000 (size 335544320):
> kmemleak: comm "swapper", pid 0, jiffies 4294892296
> kmemleak: min_count = 0
> kmemleak: count = 0
> kmemleak: flags = 0x1
> kmemleak: checksum = 0
> kmemleak: backtrace:
>
> Fixes: f41f2ed43ca5 ("mm: hugetlb: free the vmemmap pages associated with each HugeTLB page")
> Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@...wei.com>
> ---
> include/linux/bootmem_info.h | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bootmem_info.h b/include/linux/bootmem_info.h
> index cc35d010fa94..899bc56948f7 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bootmem_info.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bootmem_info.h
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
> #define __LINUX_BOOTMEM_INFO_H
>
> #include <linux/mm.h>
> +#include <linux/kmemleak.h>
>
> /*
> * Types for free bootmem stored in page->lru.next. These have to be in
> @@ -38,9 +39,10 @@ static inline void free_bootmem_page(struct page *page)
> */
> VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_ref_count(page) != 2, page);
I am wondering if we should fix put_page_bootmem() instead of
free_bootmem_page() since there are some users of put_page_bootmem()
to free a page allocated from memblock which also can be reused
afterwards.
Thanks.
>
> - if (magic == SECTION_INFO || magic == MIX_SECTION_INFO)
> + if (magic == SECTION_INFO || magic == MIX_SECTION_INFO) {
> + kmemleak_free_part(page_to_virt(page), PAGE_SIZE);
> put_page_bootmem(page);
> - else
> + } else
> VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(1, page);
> }
> #else
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists