lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 19 Aug 2022 06:29:22 -1000
From:   Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:     "zhaoyang.huang" <zhaoyang.huang@...soc.com>
Cc:     Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Zhaoyang Huang <huangzhaoyang@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
        ke.wang@...soc.com, Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
        Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
        Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] memcg: use root_mem_cgroup when css is inherited

On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 07:29:22PM +0800, zhaoyang.huang wrote:
> From: Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@...soc.com>
> 
> It is observed in android system where per-app cgroup is demanded by freezer
> subsys and part of groups require memory control. The hierarchy could be simplized
> as bellowing where memory charged on group B abserved while we only want have
> group E's memory be controlled and B's descendants compete freely for memory.
> This should be the consequences of unified hierarchy.
> Under this scenario, less efficient memory reclaim is observed when comparing
> with no memory control. It is believed that multi LRU scanning introduces some
> of the overhead. Furthermore, page thrashing is also heavier than global LRU
> which could be the consequences of partial failure of WORKINGSET mechanism as
> LRU is too short to protect the active pages.
> 
> A(subtree_control = memory) - B(subtree_control = NULL) - C()
> 							\ D()
> 			    - E(subtree_control = memory) - F()
> 							  \ G()
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@...soc.com>

Just in case it wasn't clear.

Nacked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ