lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALzav=fHWjAXthLUHJf2LdKCx1i4UO1u7iK0C6gw=y4sRw37-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 19 Aug 2022 15:35:07 -0700
From:   David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>
To:     Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@...gle.com>
Cc:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: selftests: Run dirty_log_perf_test on specific cpus

On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 3:34 PM David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 03:20:06PM -0700, Vipin Sharma wrote:
> >
> > This will assume all tests have the same pinning requirement and
> > format. What if some tests have more than one worker threads after the
> > vcpus?
>
> Even if a test has other worker threads, this proposal would still be
> logically consistent. The flag is defined to only control the vCPU
> threads and the main threads.

s/main threads/main thread/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ