[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALzav=fHWjAXthLUHJf2LdKCx1i4UO1u7iK0C6gw=y4sRw37-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 15:35:07 -0700
From: David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>
To: Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@...gle.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: selftests: Run dirty_log_perf_test on specific cpus
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 3:34 PM David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 03:20:06PM -0700, Vipin Sharma wrote:
> >
> > This will assume all tests have the same pinning requirement and
> > format. What if some tests have more than one worker threads after the
> > vcpus?
>
> Even if a test has other worker threads, this proposal would still be
> logically consistent. The flag is defined to only control the vCPU
> threads and the main threads.
s/main threads/main thread/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists