[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ae1c301a-60e4-5112-6681-8896a7479207@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 11:38:29 +0300
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Marek Behún <kabel@...nel.org>,
linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: leds: register-bit-led: Add active-low
property
On 19/08/2022 11:08, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
>>> Although the question is - where is the user of it?
>>
>> I was planning to send updated powerpc DTS files with these
>> register-bit-led definitions after accepting dt bindings.
>
> We need device tree people to ack them, first. But a note saying "this
> is for Turris Omnia router" would be welcome.
In general the process is one of:
1. Send DT bindings with driver and DTS changes,
2. Send DT bindings with driver in one patchset, DTS in second but you
mention the dependency.
You should not wait with DTS till bindings got accepted. Why? Because
for example we do not want bindings for stuff which never is going to be
upstreamed (with several exceptions, e.g. for other systems). Also
because we want to be able to compare bindings with your DTS
implementing them, so we are sure you described everything (especially
that you said running one command to install dtchema and second command
to make the check is not possible in your system).
Without DTS here how can anyone be sure your DTS actually follows the
bindings?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists