[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0aba8906-ed30-786e-cff4-6cb70d6e73c5@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 12:05:30 +0300
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Sergiu.Moga@...rochip.com, lee@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com,
alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com,
radu_nicolae.pirea@....ro, richard.genoud@...il.com,
mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jirislaby@...nel.org,
admin@...iphile.com, Kavyasree.Kotagiri@...rochip.com
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] dt-bindings: mfd: atmel,at91-usart: convert to
json-schema
On 19/08/2022 11:47, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 19/08/2022 11:38, Sergiu.Moga@...rochip.com wrote:
>> On 18.08.2022 11:39, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>>>
>>> On 17/08/2022 10:55, Sergiu Moga wrote:
>>>> Convert at91 USART DT Binding for Atmel/Microchip SoCs to
>>>> json-schema format.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sergiu Moga <sergiu.moga@...rochip.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> .../bindings/mfd/atmel,at91-usart.yaml | 190 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>> .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-usart.txt | 98 ---------
>>>> 2 files changed, 190 insertions(+), 98 deletions(-)
>>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel,at91-usart.yaml
>>>> delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-usart.txt
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel,at91-usart.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel,at91-usart.yaml
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 000000000000..cf15d73fa1e8
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel,at91-usart.yaml
>>> One more thing - I think this should be in serial directory, not mfd,
>>> even though it includes SPI. MFD is just a Linux naming/wrapper device.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Krzysztof
>>
>> I would rather keep it in this directory, since its corresponding driver
>> is also in the mfd directory.
>
> Sorry, but that's poor argument. Driver subsystems match Linux
> convention, not necessarily hardware type/naming. Bindings directories
> match hardware. MFD bindings are only for MFD wrapper drivers and this
> is a serial interface. Not a MFD. You even do not add MFD devices in the
> driver but add *always one* device depending on serial feature you want.
> This is not even MFD device but regular platform device with children.
>
> You put it in SoC, though, because all other SoCs store it there...
The last one should be:
You could put it in SoC, though, because all other SoCs store it there...
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists